Monthly Archives: December 2010

Will Personhood Bill(s) finally pass Republican-Majority U.S. House (49-vote GOP advantage) in 112th Congress ?

The 49-vote GOP advantage Republican-Majority U.S. House is to be sworn in as part of the 112th Congress on January 5, 2011 – ONE WEEK FROM TODAY !!!

HOUSE CALENDAR
January 2011
112th Congress, First Session
http://republicanwhip.house.gov/Calendar/112th1stSessionCalendar.pdf
January 5 – Swearing-In Day

How long is it going to take these Republicans to do their first moral duty, and insure that no PERSON is deprived of LIFE without due process of law, including PERSONS in the womb, beginning at fertilization, with no exceptions !!!???


The first Creator-endowed, unalienable right, is the right to life. All other rights are secondary to the right to life. Without the “right to life” secure, no other “right” has meaning, no other “right” is secure. It’s common sense.


America’s greatest problem is spiritual. America has rejected the Lord Jesus Christ, and so America has rejected the Law of God, including Exodus 20:13, KJB. Repentance, by Christians, is God’s remedy to bring healing to America (2 Chronicles 7:14, KJB). It is the responsibility of Christians to be Salt and Light to this nation (Matthew 5:13-16, KJB).


Child-killing is the most important moral issue facing America today – to stop the shedding of innocent blood which incurs the wrath and judgment of God (read Jeremiah chapter 19, Psalm 106:37-44, and 2 Kings chapters 24 and 25, KJB).


Child-murder/sacrifice-by-“abortion” is an OFFENSE to GOD. ACCORDING TO GOD’S OWN WORDS, child-sacrifice defiles His Sanctuary, and profanes His Holy Name (Leviticus 20:3, KJB). If that does not make it a priority for remedy, then clearly this is a nation that does not have the proper reverential FEAR OF GOD.

CHILD-MURDER BY “ABORTION” CAN BE ENDED BY RECOGNIZING THE PERSONHOOD OF PRE-BIRTH HUMAN BEINGS, AT FERTILIZATION, WITHOUT EXCEPTIONS.

December 29, 2010 / Revised and Corrected February 10, 2010

Read and download the complete report here.

150th Anniversary of War Between Americans, 1861-1865: God’s Righteous Judgment upon both North and South for National Sin of Unbiblical American Slavery – Part 10(c)

Part 10(c) – South Carolina Secession Convention declares “Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union”
SLAVERY, SLAVERY, SLAVERYDecember 24, 1860

December 24, 1860 (Charleston, SC) – “David F. Jamison, President of Convention of the People of South Carolina, appointed a committee “to draft a summary statement of the causes which justify the secession of South Carolina.” Charles G. Memminger was part of this committee and is considered the main author of the “summary statement” that became known as the “Declaration of Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina.”
www.teachingushistory.org/lessons/DecofImCauses.htm

“The convention, … , in formulating a separate justification for its simple statement of repeal, would make it clear that it adopted the Ordinance of Secession to defend slavery.

“… the convention … voted by a margin of more than four to one to issue the declaration. Thus they agreed, in the words of delegate Lawrence M. Keitt, to “rest disunion upon the question of slavery.”
Source: Relic of the Lost Cause, The Story of South Carolina’s Ordinance of Secession, by Charles H. Lesser, South Carolina Department of Archives and History, 1990, page 11.

[ emphasis added ]

“The convention, … , in formulating a separate justification for its simple statement of repeal, would make it clear that it adopted the Ordinance of Secession to defend slavery. Shortly before the committee to draft the ordinance made its report on the 20th, President Jamison, who doubtless was privy to the committee’s work, had appointed another “Committee to draft a summary statement of the causes which justify the secession of South Carolina.” Christopher G. Memminger, a conservative former Unionist from Charleston who later served as secretary of the treasury of the Confederacy, chaired the committee. Memminger’s committee reported the next day, but it was the 24th before the convention adopted the “Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union.”

“A short document, the “Declaration of Immediate Causes” claimed that the northern states had “deliberately broken” the federal compact by repudiating their responsibility under the fourth article of the United States Constitution to return runaway slaves. South Carolina was thus “released from her obligation.” This constitutional argument did not please everyone. In the debate in the convention, Maxcy Gregg, in particular, argued that the committee’s proposed statement was insufficient for “a new Declaration of Independence.” The document should, he said, also emphasize the tariff and federal expenditures for internal improvements. Although Gregg’s unhappiness with the document’s exclusive emphasis on slavery would be echoed later, the convention overrode his objections and voted by a margin of more than four to one to issue the declaration. Thus they agreed, in the words of delegate Lawrence M. Keitt, to “rest disunion upon the question of slavery.”

continued…

” … the Ordinance of Secession endures at “the vital center of our history,” a Declaration of Independence, defense of slavery, trophy of war, and relic of the Lost Cause.”

Source: Relic of the Lost Cause, The Story of South Carolina’s Ordinance of Secession, by Charles H. Lesser, South Carolina Department of Archives and History, 1990, pp. 11, 20.

Read and download the complete report here.

150th Anniversary of War Between Americans, 1861-1865: God’s Judgment upon both North and South for National Sin of Unbiblical American Slavery – Part 3

Part 3 – John C. Calhoun’s last speech in the United States Senate: 1850

March 4, 1850 – U.S. Senator John C. Calhoun: Agitation of the subject of Slavery would, if not prevented, end in Disunion.
[Calhoun died March 31, 1850]

In the United States Senate: “I have, senators, believed from the first that the agitation of the subject of slavery would, if not prevented by some timely and effective measure, end in disunion.”

continued…

“The agitation has been permitted to proceed, with almost no attempt to resist it, until it has reached a point when it can no longer be disguised or denied that the Union is in danger.”

continued…

“Unless something decisive is done, I again ask, What is to stop this agitation before the great and final object at which it aims — the abolition of slavery in the States — is consummated? Is it, then, not certain that if something is not done to arrest it, the South will be forced to choose between abolition and secession?”

THE CAUSES BY WHICH THE UNION IS ENDANGERED
United States Senator (SC) John C. Calhoun
March 4, 1850
http://civilwarcauses.org/saddress.htm

____________________________________________

John C. Calhoun: Unitarian [denier of Christ’s divinity, i.e., not a Christian], Scotch-Irish, South Carolinian, advocate of Slavery, States’ Rights, and Nullification.

John C. Calhoun (1782-1850)

United States Senator (SC) (1845-1850)
United States Secretary of State (1844-1845)
United States Senator (SC) (1832-1843)
Vice President of the United States (1825-1832)
United States Secretary of War (1817-1825)
U.S. House of Representatives (SC) (1811-1817)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Calhoun

Read and download the complete report here.

Republicans will have 49-vote advantage in U.S. House, 112th Congress (2011-2012)

– After 20+ Years, will “Personhood” Bill(s) now finally pass in U.S. House ?

112th Congress (2011-2012) – United States House of Representatives:
242 Republicans, 193 Democrats.

Republicans will have a 49-vote advantage.

United States Capitol (2007)

112th United States Congress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/112th_United_States_Congress
Duration: January 3, 2011 – January 3, 2013

United States House of Representatives elections, 2010 [ November 2 ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_elections,_2010

___________________________________________________

PERSONHOOD BILLS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: 1989 and 1993 – 2010.

After over 20 years that Personhood Legislation has been filed in the United States House of Representatives ( going back continuously to at least 1993, and, with interruption, going back to at least 1989 ); and at various times in the United States Senate …

… WILL FEDERAL PERSONHOOD BILL(S) NOW FINALLY PASS THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE 112TH CONGRESS, WHEN REPUBLICANS HAVE A 49-VOTE ADVANTAGE BEGINNING JANUARY 3, 2011 ?

In the 12 Years the Republicans were in the Majority in the U.S. House from January 1995 to January 2007***, Federal Personhood bill(s) were filed EVERY YEAR.

*** In the 104th Congress (1995-1996), and the 105th Congress (1997-1998), and the 106th Congress (1999-2000), and the 107th Congress (2001-2002), and the 108th Congress (2003-2004), and the 109th Congress (2005-2006), the Republicans were in the Majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.

HOWEVER, NOT ONLY DID THE REPEATED REPUBLICAN MAJORITIES IN THE U.S. HOUSE IN THE 104TH, 105TH, 106TH, 107TH, 108TH and 109TH U.S. CONGRESSES NEVER ACTUALLY PASS ANY FEDERAL PERSONHOOD LEGISLATION WHILE IN POWER FOR 12 YEARS, THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NEVER EVEN ONE HEARING ON PERSONHOOD LEGISLATION BEFORE THE FULL U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN THOSE 12 YEARS, AND THERE WAS APPARENTY NOT EVEN ONE HOUSE JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING IN THOSE 12 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN MAJORITY RULE !!!

NO PUBLIC HEARING FOR RIGHT TO LIFE ACT, EVEN AFTER 12 STRAIGHT YEARS OF REPUBLICAN CONTROL !!!
12 STRAIGHT YEARS (1995-2006), AND STILL NO PUBLIC HEARING IN THE US HOUSE FOR THE RIGHT TO LIFE ACT BILL TO END ABORTION IN AMERICA – DESPITE 12 STRAIGHT YEARS OF REPUBLICAN MAJORITIES
http://christianlifeandliberty.net/HR552-05.doc

December 9, 2010 / Revised and Corrected January 26, 2011

Read and download the complete report here.

150th Anniversary of War Between Americans, 1861-1865: God’s Judgment upon both North and South for National Sin of Unbiblical American Slavery – Part 2

Part 2 – Baptist Church Splits over Slavery: 1845

1845 – The Southern Baptist Convention is formed, splitting from the Baptist Triennial Convention.

Southern Baptist Beginnings
The Southern Baptist Convention Organized

www.baptisthistory.org/sbaptistbeginnings.htm
[ emphasis added ]

In 1844, Georgia Baptists asked the Home Mission Society to appoint a slaveholder to be a missionary in Georgia. After much discussion, the appointment was declined. A few months later, the Alabama Baptist Convention asked the Foreign Mission Society if they would appoint a slaveholder as a missionary. When the society said no, Virginia Baptists called for Baptists of the South to meet at Augusta, Georgia, in early May, 1845, for the purpose of consulting “on the best means of promoting the Foreign Mission cause, and other interests of the Baptist denomination in the South.”

Thus, on May 8, 1845, about 293 Baptist leaders of the South gathered at the First Baptist Church, Augusta, Georgia, representing over 365,000 Baptists. They concluded, with expressions of regret from their own leaders and from distinguished northern Baptist leaders,that more could be accomplished in Christian work by the organization in the South of a separate Baptist body for missionary work. The Methodists in the South had already separated over the issue of slavery, and southern Presbyterians would do so later.

[ source quoted more extensively further below ]

Read and download the complete report here.

150th Anniversary of War Between Americans, 1861-1865: God’s Judgment upon America for National Sin of Unbiblical Slavery – Part 1

Part 1 – Methodist Church Splits over Slavery: 1843, 1844

1843 – Wesleyan Methodist Church separates from Methodist Episcopal Church

1844 – The Methodist Episcopal Church splits into:
The Methodist Episcopal Church (North), and The Methodist Episcopal Church, South.

John Wesley advocated for freedom from slavery to William Wilberforce, who was a member of the English Parliament.

(Read more.)
http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/bible/slavery.html

“The churches divided over the issue of slavery. American Methodists at first followed John Wesley’s strong anti-slavery stance, denouncing participation in the slave trade and slaveholding, but later they yielded to economic and political pressures.”

Read and download the complete report here.