– Call Seven Republican Senators to Filibuster !
– The Senate Judiciary Committee ( SJC ) met Tuesday, July 13 with the Kagan nomination on the agenda, however, as expected, the Republicans ( Senator Sessions – AL ) made the request under the Committee Rules ( Rule I. ) to put the debate on Kagan’s nomination off for one week. It is now scheduled for Tuesday, July 20.
– QUESTION: Will the Seven Republicans Filibuster Kagan’s nomination in the Committee ?
Click here for the complete report.
Category Archives: Uncategorized - Page 6
(Video) Senate Judiciary Committee delays Kagan nomination debate one week until July 20
ASK THESE SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS TO FILIBUSTER
THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE !
Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK).
Please call Washington DC Capitol switchboard toll-free and ask for each of these Senator’s offices:
D.C. Capitol Switchboard:
202-224-3121
Toll-free #’s for D.C. Capitol switchboard:
1-866-220-0044
1-866-340-9281
1-888-355-3588
1-800-450-8293
1-877-851-6437
1-877-762-8722
1-877-762-8762
1-800-833-6354
1-866-808-0065
ASK THE OFFICES OF EACH OF THESE SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS TO REQUEST THAT THESE MEN ( Senators Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK) ) COMMIT TO FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE !
Please call today Monday, July 12 as soon as possible, and Tuesday morning, July 13, before 10 AM.
Senate Judiciary Committee meeting scheduled for July 13 on Kagan Nomination
http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=4681
_______________________________________________________
FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE:
PLEASE CALL THE SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AND TELL THEM YOU WANT THEM TO FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. IF ALL SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS WILL AGREE TO FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, THEN THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION CAN BE BLOCKED.
Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee CAN FILIBUSTER AND STOP KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION right in the Senate Judiciary Committee, HOWEVER ONLY IF ALL SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS STAND FIRM AND VOTE AGAINST ENDING DEBATE (cloture) AND BRINGING THE MATTER OF KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION TO A VOTE. Please call the Washington DC offices of these seven Republican Senators on the Judiciary Committee as soon as possible on Friday (July 9) and on Monday (July 12 – when the Senators return to Washington, DC after their break): Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK).
Republicans in Senate Judiciary Committee CAN Stop Kagan’s Confirmation
The seven Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee can STOP KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION by invoking Rule IV. of the Senate Judiciary Committee Rules, and BLOCKING THE VOTE right in the Committee.
PLEASE CALL THE WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICES OF THE SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
___________________________________________________
After their recess, after U.S. Senators on the Judiciary Committee return July 12 to the Capitol in Washington, D.C., there will be the question of actually voting on the Elena Kagan nomination in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
However, if the seven Republican Senators choose to truly uphold their oaths, and do all in their power to BLOCK the appointment of this dangerous nominee, this domestic enemy of the written United States Constitution, Elena Kagan , the Rules of the Senate Judiciary Committee [ Rule IV. BRINGING A MATTER TO A VOTE ] require that at least one Republican vote in favor of bringing the Kagan nomination to a vote. That means one of these seven would have to be a “Benedict Arnold” – and betray their Oath of Office and their country: Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK) – however if all seven will stand firm and vote against bringing confirmation of the Kagan nomination to a vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee – then the Kagan confirmation can be BLOCKED right in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Please call the seven Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee at their Washington, D.C. offices as soon as possible (the Senators themselves are on break this week, but the Senate offices are open and staffed), and tell them you are asking each and every Senator to invoke Rule IV. of the Senate Judiciary Committee Rules, which means that unless at least one minority party (i.e. Republican) member agrees to end debate and to bring a matter to vote, then the Kagan confirmation cannot even be voted upon. In other words, this is the equivalent of a Committee-level filibuster, and as long as all seven Republican Senators vote against ending debate and bringing the matter to a vote, then KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION CAN BE STOPPED RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE !!!
Rules of Procedure United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary:
IV. BRINGING A MATTER TO A VOTE
[emphasis added]
The Chairman shall entertain a non-debatable motion to bring a matter before the Committee to a vote. If there is objection to bring the matter to a vote without further debate, a roll call vote of the Committee shall be taken, and debate shall be terminated if the motion to bring the matter to a vote without further debate passes with ten votes in the affirmative, one of which must be cast by the minority.
_________________________________________________
This is yet another opportunity for incumbent Republicans to show whether they are worth having in office. It is great that Senators Sessions, Kyl, Cornyn, and Coburn, for example, asked judicial activist, pro-abortion, pro-sodomite, anti-Christ, feminist Solicitor General Elena Kagan tough questions during the confirmation hearings on June 29 and June 30, and to the extent she even really answered the questions (or by her record and non-answers when she did not), her anti-Constitutional views, positions, and record were exposed, to a greater or lesser extent. However, that was all words – now is coming the time for the VOTE – are these seven Republican Senators going to use the procedural tool that is available to them within the scope of their authority and power, to protect America and the American people from this domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution ?!! If not, then those of these seven who will not, do not need to be re-elected to office when their present term expires.
Senators Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK) – WILL YOU UPHOLD YOUR OATHS OF OFFICE, AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES FROM THIS DOMESTIC ENEMY, ELENA KAGAN ? – OR WILL YOU REFUSE TO INVOKE RULE IV. AND ALLOW HER CONFIRMATION TO PASS OUT OF THE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, ONE STEP CLOSER TO A LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, WHERE SHE CAN SHRED THE CONSTITUTION (as now JUSTICE SONIA SOTOMAYOR HAS ALREADY STARTED TRYING TO DO – e.g., Citizens United free speech case – the first Supreme Court case argued by Solicitor General Elena Kagan), AND PUT AT FURTHER RISK THE LIFE, LIBERTIES, AND PROPERTY OF AMERICAN CITIZENS ?!!
Please call the seven Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee as soon as possible, today (July 8), Friday (July 9), and Monday (July 12), and inform them of your request that they invoke Rule IV. of the Senate Judiciary Committee Rules, and BLOCK the vote on confirmation of the Kagan nomination to a lifetime appointment to the United States Supreme Court.
__________________________________________________________
“Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; …”
Psalm 33:12
“The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.”
Psalm 9:17, KJB
“But judgment shall return unto righteousness: and all the upright in heart shall follow it.”
Psalm 94:15, KJB
“… I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” Matthew 16:18
Yeshua Messiah
Hallelu-Yah !
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
PO Box 50358
Columbia, SC 29250
(803) 794-6273
www.ChristianLifeandLiberty.net
www.RighttoLifeActofSC.net
www.LefemineForLife.net
July 8, 2010
Kagan Hearings Day 3:
Kagan: Precedent can [sic] be more important than Original Intent
– (Video) Questions by Senator Cornyn (R-TX), June 30, 2010
Judicial activist Elena Kagan tells Senator Cornyn Precedent can be more important than Original Intent.
There is nothing more that any United States Senator, Republican or Democrat (who have also taken Oaths of Office to uphold the U.S. Constitution) needs to know about this domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution – Elena Kagan, TO VOTE “NAY” TO HER NOMINATION. Oath-Breakers such as Lindsey Graham (RINO-SC) who voted “Yea” for Judicial Activist, Racist, La Raza Member, Feminist, Roman Catholic, Sonia Sotomayor on August 6, 2009, should be receiving volumes of e-mails and phone calls during the Senate recess break this week (July 5-9) to admonish him to uphold his Oath of Office this time, and TO VOTE “NAY” TO KAGAN’S NOMINATION.
If this pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, anti-Christ, feminist lawyer Kagan is confirmed by the U.S. Senate for appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, we can expect her to work to re-make America in the image of her own anti-Biblical worldview; she would not be “hindered” by the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution, and therefore she would not be “hindered” by the Oaths of Office she would take as a Supreme Court Justice, to uphold the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:
Text of the Oaths of Office for Supreme Court Justices [ from the SCOTUS website ]
www.supremecourt.gov/about/oath/textoftheoathsofoffice2009.aspx
Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States are required to take two oaths before they may execute the duties of their appointed office.
1. The Constitutional Oath
As noted below in Article VI, U.S. Constitution, all federal officials must take an oath in support of the Constitution: [ emphasis added ]
“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
NOTE: – The Oath of Office is to support and defend the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, not Supreme Court Precedent !!!
– Also, Article VI., U.S. Constitution explicitly states there are three things which are “the supreme Law of the Land” –
1) The U.S. Constitution itself;
2) Laws of the United States (Federal Laws) made in pursuance thereof; and
3) U.S. Treaties
NOT ONE WORD IN THE U.S CONSTITUTION ABOUT THE SUPREMACY OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS OR PRECEDENT !
2. The Judicial Oath
“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
By her record, by her [repeated non-] answers before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, it is clear Obama’s nominee Elena Kagan has no intention of upholding the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution – therefore, no United States Senator should give Kagan their vote for confirmation; and every Senator should do their utmost to block her confirmation,including blocking the vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Rule IV. of that Committee provides a way for the vote to be blocked, IF ALL SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS ON THE COMMITTEE STAND FIRM, and do all within their power to block these DANGEROUS, UNQUALIFIED, DOMESTIC ENEMY OF THE CONSTITUTION.
“They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them.” Proverb 28:4, KJB
Kagan Hearings Day 1:
(Video) Opening Statement by Senator Sessions (R-AL), June 28, 2010
Senator Sessions summarizes his concerns regarding Obama’s SCOTUS nominee, Elena Kagan
_________________________________________________
Solicitor General Elena Kagan
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing
C-SPAN Networks
http://c-span.org/Special/Supreme-Court-Kagan-Senate-Confirmation-Hearing.aspx
Video (2:09:54)
__________________________________________________
Confirmation Hearing, Day One: Monday, June 28
Opening Statements By Senator
Ranking Member Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Video – 10+ minutes (13:19 – 23:44)
http://c-span.org/Special/Supreme-Court-Kagan-Senate-Confirmation-Hearing-34758.aspx
Senator Sessions’ concerns including:
Elena Kagan’s lack of real legal experience, her views and actions regarding socialism, court activism, restriction of gun rights, opposition to (CCL: even) partial-birth abortion, her assertion in court as Solicitor General that the federal government is allowed to ban publication of political free speech pamphlets before an election, a legal brief filed approved by her as Solicitor General asking the Supreme Court to “strike down provisions of the Legal Arizona Workers Act, which suspends or revokes business licenses of corporations which knowingly hire illegal immigrants, even though federal law expressly prohibits such hiring.” Her actions as Solicitor General regarding the Congress’ “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy for the US Military appear to have “deliberately and unnecessarily” put that law in jeopardy. Her association of herself with openly activist judges. Concerns as President and Congress have taken actions which are consistent with the revival of the Progressive philosophy from a century ago, which viewed the United States Constitution as an outdated impediment to their vision for a “new social and political order”.
List of America’s 300+ most pro-sodomite companies: 2010
2010 Corporate Equality [sic] Index
9/14/2009
www.hrc.org/about_us/13523.htm
2010 Corporate Equality [sic] Index pdf (1.83MB)
www.hrc.org/documents/HRC_Corporate_Equality_Index_2010.pdf
[ Rating source: pro-sodomite Human Rights [ sic ] Campaign ]
Are these the kind of companies that Christians want to do business with ?
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
June 24, 2010 / Revised June 25, 2010
Federal jury decides in favor of pro-morality Boy Scouts against eviction by pro-sodomite City of Philadelphia
“A federal jury Wednesday decided that Philadelphia violated the Boy Scouts’ First Amendment rights by using the organization’s anti-gay [sic: “anti-sodomite”] policy as a reason to evict them from their city-owned offices near Logan Square.”
www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/97007434.html?cmpid=15585797
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
June 24, 2010
GEN Stan McChrystal:
Jesuit-ruled CFR-member, CFR military fellow 1999-2000, West Point Class of 1976, US / NATO / NWO Afghan Cdr in hot water with Usurper-in-Chief Obama; offers to resign.
President Obama receives McChrystal in the Oval Office in May 2009.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_A._McChrystal
Keep that in mind as we are already beginning to hear the propaganda machine of the CFR-controlled corporate establishment media cranking out the news stories designed to once again falsely convince We the American people that we need to support another unjustified war, this time with Iran.
ARTL Criticizes Rival National Right To Life
DENVER, June 23 / PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — American Right To Life Action, the political 527 group which claims a role in derailing Mitt Romney’s presidential hopes, is now publishing a critical profile of the National Right To Life Committee. American RTL’s anticipated dossier of its rival arrives simultaneously with National RTL’s annual convention this weekend in Pittsburgh.
Personhood top legislative priority for Richard Cash for Congress, 3rd District (SC)
Richard Cash:
“… the personhood of the unborn child must be established beginning at the moment of conception.”
Anderson County Republican Party
Congressional Candidate Debate
Anderson University, Anderson, SC
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Richard Cash for Congress
Candidate for US Congress, 3rd District SC
www.youtube.com/user/liamoweny#p/u/5/ARKty3G8NCc (debate footage)
Video (1:28)
Richard Cash:
” … I would introduce a bill to say that personhood begins at conception.”
“Folks, obviously the right to life is the first and foremost right that any person has.”
“It’s the first responsibility of government to defend the nation [ from ] foreign enemies, and to establish justice at home. And that is why the personhood of the unborn child must be established beginning at the moment of conception. Thank you very much [ audience applause ].
_________________________________________________
Independent-Mail (Anderson, SC)
Republican candidates stress need to watch spending
www.independentmail.com/news/2010/apr/06/republican-candidates-stress-need-watch-spending/
Posted April 6, 2010
[ emphasis added ]
Four of five Republican candidates running for South Carolina’s 3rd Congressional District seat say their first piece of legislation would be about watching the money, while another says he would take aim at defining the beginning of “personhood.”
Those candidates ice-cream-truck businessman Richard Cash, state Rep. Rex Rice, attorney Neal Collins, Dr. Mike Vasovski and state Rep. Jeff Duncan offered their priorities Tuesday night during a debate hosted by the Anderson County Republican Party. Aside from discussing their first wished-for bills, they all said that jobs to the district is crucial among priorities for the next congressman.
continued…
[ Richard ] Cash, who spent eight years working with Pastors for Life, said he would first introduce a bill “that says personhood begins at conception.” He got an ovation from the crowd gathered in Henderson Auditorium at Anderson University.
continued…
© 2010 Anderson Independent Mail. All rights reserved.

Recent Comments