1) INVASION ( 2 Kings 24:1-4, KJB ) and
2) TYRANNY ( Psalm 106:37-44, KJB )
- Only Repentance will Save America, including Repentance from the
Ongoing Shedding of Innocent Blood in the Womb.
- The INVASION of Millions of Illegal Aliens, and TYRANNY through an unjust Federal Judge.
- U.S. District Court Judge ruling – July 28, 2010
Monthly Archives: July 2010
Arizona Federal Judge Ruling Highlights Two Spiritual Consequences of America’s "Abortion" Innocent Bloodshed:
1) INVASION ( 2 Kings 24:1-4, KJB ) and
National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) originally founded in 1968 under the auspices of the National Conference of [ Roman ] Catholic Bishops (NCCB)
K.M. Cassidy. ”Right to Life.” In Dictionary of Christianity in America, Coordinating Editor, Daniel G. Reid.
Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVaristy Press, 1990. pp. 1017,1018.
“The Supreme Court decision of January 22, 1973, overthrowing all existing abortion laws, led to an enormous growth in the movement. The National Right to Life Committee which had been founded in 1968 under the auspices of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, in 1973 became autonomous and non-sectarian. It is the largest and most influential national organization, with well over two thousand local affiliates by the 1980s.”
[ emphasis added / asterisks noting related articles not included ]
[ emphasis added ]
Right to Life. A movement opposed to the taking of innocent human life at any time from conception to natural death. The term pro-life is often used as well. Arising as a reaction to the movement for liberalized abortion, the first permanent group was founded in New York in 1966. From early on, however, Right to Life groups were concerned with the question of euthanasia as well and came to devote more of their energies to this subject during the 1980s.
The Supreme Court decision of January 22, 1973, overthrowing all existing abortion laws, led to an enormous growth in the movement. The National Right to Life Committee which had been founded in 1968 under the auspices of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, in 1973 became autonomous and non-sectarian. It is the largest and most influential national organization, with well over two thousand local affiliates by the 1980s. A large number of other groups appeared as well, many the product of splits within the movement over strategy and tactics ( e.g., American Life Lobby, Pro-Life Action League ) and others appealing to specific constituencies ( e.g., National Youth ProLife Coalition, Feminists for Life, Lutherans for Life ). The movement is diverse, its members representing a wide range of religious and political viewpoints, and is monolithic only in its rejection of killing the innocent.
While the Right to Life movement from its beginning has had members of a variety of religions, it was initially heavily Roman Catholic in composition. The later 1970s saw a huge influx of evangelical Protestants and this helped propel it to new prominence and political impact. The movement developed in Canada as well. The Alliance for Life was founded in 1968 and by the 1980s represented over two hundred local affiliates.
[ emphasis added / asterisks noting related articles not included ]
of pro-abortion, pro-sodomite, feminist, anti-Christ, domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution, Elena Kagan to lifetime appointment on SCOTUS, in July 20 vote
- The Elena Kagan nomination was approved by a vote of 13 – 6 in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- The Senate Judiciary Committee has 12 Democrats and seven Republicans. All 12 Democrats PLUS one RINO – Senator Lindsey Graham (RINO-SC) voted to approve Elena Kagan, versus all six of the other Republicans who voted against the nomination of Elena Kagan. South Carolina’s RINO Republican, Lindsey ” Grahamnesty“ was the only Republican to vote “Aye” for the Kagan confirmation.
- They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them.
Proverb 28:4, KJB
- When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.
Proverb 29:2, KJB
- The wicked are ruling in America because God’s people [ born-again Christians ] have failed to be Salt and Light in America (Matthew 5:13-16, KJB), including failing to more fully work to ESTABLISH JUSTICE for the innocent pre-born (by establishing PERSONHOOD at fertilization with no exceptions), resulting in the continued shedding of their innocent blood, which is polluting this land (Numbers 35:33, KJB), and resulting in “the wrath of the LORD” being “kindled against His people” and the LORD giving us into “the hand of the heathen” such that those that hate us [ born-again Christians ] rule over us (Psalm 106:36-44). So-called “Christian” [sic] America, despite the wide presence of church buildings, pulpiteers, and professing Christians, is one of the most pro-abortion countries in the world ( See: World Abortion Law Map – http://christianlifeandliberty.net/2009-10-05-World-Abortion-Law-Map.doc ).
- “For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required; …”
Luke 12:48; KJB
July 20, 2010
Click here for the complete report.
- Call Seven Republican Senators to Filibuster !
- The Senate Judiciary Committee ( SJC ) met Tuesday, July 13 with the Kagan nomination on the agenda, however, as expected, the Republicans ( Senator Sessions – AL ) made the request under the Committee Rules ( Rule I. ) to put the debate on Kagan’s nomination off for one week. It is now scheduled for Tuesday, July 20.
- QUESTION: Will the Seven Republicans Filibuster Kagan’s nomination in the Committee ?
Click here for the complete report.
New World Order’s CFR-member, 33rd Degree Mason, Roman Catholic, Newt "NAFTA" Gingrich says he may run for President in 2012
Newt Gingrich: I’m considering White House run
Calls Obama ‘disaster’ who’d go down as worst president in modern times
Gingrich says he’s considering a presidential run
Jul 12 01:20 PM US/Eastern
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) – Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich says he’s considering running for president in 2012 and expects to make a decision by early next year.
In an interview Monday with The Associated Press, Gingrich predicted a Republican would defeat Democratic President Barack Obama in 2012.
Gingrich says he’ll focus on the midterm elections this fall, then decide whether to seek the Republican nomination by next February or March.
Gingrich was in Des Moines for a fundraiser and workshop for local Republican candidates.
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE !
Please call Washington DC Capitol switchboard toll-free and ask for each of these Senator’s offices:
D.C. Capitol Switchboard:
Toll-free #’s for D.C. Capitol switchboard:
ASK THE OFFICES OF EACH OF THESE SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS TO REQUEST THAT THESE MEN ( Senators Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK) ) COMMIT TO FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE !
Please call today Monday, July 12 as soon as possible, and Tuesday morning, July 13, before 10 AM.
Senate Judiciary Committee meeting scheduled for July 13 on Kagan Nomination
FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE:
PLEASE CALL THE SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AND TELL THEM YOU WANT THEM TO FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. IF ALL SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS WILL AGREE TO FILIBUSTER THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, THEN THE KAGAN CONFIRMATION CAN BE BLOCKED.
Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee CAN FILIBUSTER AND STOP KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION right in the Senate Judiciary Committee, HOWEVER ONLY IF ALL SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS STAND FIRM AND VOTE AGAINST ENDING DEBATE (cloture) AND BRINGING THE MATTER OF KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION TO A VOTE. Please call the Washington DC offices of these seven Republican Senators on the Judiciary Committee as soon as possible on Friday (July 9) and on Monday (July 12 – when the Senators return to Washington, DC after their break): Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK).
The seven Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee can STOP KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION by invoking Rule IV. of the Senate Judiciary Committee Rules, and BLOCKING THE VOTE right in the Committee.
PLEASE CALL THE WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICES OF THE SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
After their recess, after U.S. Senators on the Judiciary Committee return July 12 to the Capitol in Washington, D.C., there will be the question of actually voting on the Elena Kagan nomination in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
However, if the seven Republican Senators choose to truly uphold their oaths, and do all in their power to BLOCK the appointment of this dangerous nominee, this domestic enemy of the written United States Constitution, Elena Kagan , the Rules of the Senate Judiciary Committee [ Rule IV. BRINGING A MATTER TO A VOTE ] require that at least one Republican vote in favor of bringing the Kagan nomination to a vote. That means one of these seven would have to be a “Benedict Arnold” – and betray their Oath of Office and their country: Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK) – however if all seven will stand firm and vote against bringing confirmation of the Kagan nomination to a vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee – then the Kagan confirmation can be BLOCKED right in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Please call the seven Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee at their Washington, D.C. offices as soon as possible (the Senators themselves are on break this week, but the Senate offices are open and staffed), and tell them you are asking each and every Senator to invoke Rule IV. of the Senate Judiciary Committee Rules, which means that unless at least one minority party (i.e. Republican) member agrees to end debate and to bring a matter to vote, then the Kagan confirmation cannot even be voted upon. In other words, this is the equivalent of a Committee-level filibuster, and as long as all seven Republican Senators vote against ending debate and bringing the matter to a vote, then KAGAN’S CONFIRMATION CAN BE STOPPED RIGHT IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE !!!
Rules of Procedure United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary:
IV. BRINGING A MATTER TO A VOTE
The Chairman shall entertain a non-debatable motion to bring a matter before the Committee to a vote. If there is objection to bring the matter to a vote without further debate, a roll call vote of the Committee shall be taken, and debate shall be terminated if the motion to bring the matter to a vote without further debate passes with ten votes in the affirmative, one of which must be cast by the minority.
This is yet another opportunity for incumbent Republicans to show whether they are worth having in office. It is great that Senators Sessions, Kyl, Cornyn, and Coburn, for example, asked judicial activist, pro-abortion, pro-sodomite, anti-Christ, feminist Solicitor General Elena Kagan tough questions during the confirmation hearings on June 29 and June 30, and to the extent she even really answered the questions (or by her record and non-answers when she did not), her anti-Constitutional views, positions, and record were exposed, to a greater or lesser extent. However, that was all words – now is coming the time for the VOTE – are these seven Republican Senators going to use the procedural tool that is available to them within the scope of their authority and power, to protect America and the American people from this domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution ?!! If not, then those of these seven who will not, do not need to be re-elected to office when their present term expires.
Senators Sessions (AL), Hatch (UT), Grassley (IA), Kyl (AZ), Graham (SC), Cornyn (TX), and Coburn (OK) – WILL YOU UPHOLD YOUR OATHS OF OFFICE, AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES FROM THIS DOMESTIC ENEMY, ELENA KAGAN ? – OR WILL YOU REFUSE TO INVOKE RULE IV. AND ALLOW HER CONFIRMATION TO PASS OUT OF THE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, ONE STEP CLOSER TO A LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, WHERE SHE CAN SHRED THE CONSTITUTION (as now JUSTICE SONIA SOTOMAYOR HAS ALREADY STARTED TRYING TO DO – e.g., Citizens United free speech case – the first Supreme Court case argued by Solicitor General Elena Kagan), AND PUT AT FURTHER RISK THE LIFE, LIBERTIES, AND PROPERTY OF AMERICAN CITIZENS ?!!
Please call the seven Republican Senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee as soon as possible, today (July 8), Friday (July 9), and Monday (July 12), and inform them of your request that they invoke Rule IV. of the Senate Judiciary Committee Rules, and BLOCK the vote on confirmation of the Kagan nomination to a lifetime appointment to the United States Supreme Court.
“Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; …”
“The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.”
Psalm 9:17, KJB
“But judgment shall return unto righteousness: and all the upright in heart shall follow it.”
Psalm 94:15, KJB
“… I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” Matthew 16:18
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
PO Box 50358
Columbia, SC 29250
July 8, 2010
Kagan: Precedent can [sic] be more important than Original Intent
- (Video) Questions by Senator Cornyn (R-TX), June 30, 2010
Judicial activist Elena Kagan tells Senator Cornyn Precedent can be more important than Original Intent.
There is nothing more that any United States Senator, Republican or Democrat (who have also taken Oaths of Office to uphold the U.S. Constitution) needs to know about this domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution – Elena Kagan, TO VOTE “NAY” TO HER NOMINATION. Oath-Breakers such as Lindsey Graham (RINO-SC) who voted “Yea” for Judicial Activist, Racist, La Raza Member, Feminist, Roman Catholic, Sonia Sotomayor on August 6, 2009, should be receiving volumes of e-mails and phone calls during the Senate recess break this week (July 5-9) to admonish him to uphold his Oath of Office this time, and TO VOTE “NAY” TO KAGAN’S NOMINATION.
If this pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, anti-Christ, feminist lawyer Kagan is confirmed by the U.S. Senate for appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, we can expect her to work to re-make America in the image of her own anti-Biblical worldview; she would not be “hindered” by the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution, and therefore she would not be “hindered” by the Oaths of Office she would take as a Supreme Court Justice, to uphold the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:
Text of the Oaths of Office for Supreme Court Justices [ from the SCOTUS website ]
Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States are required to take two oaths before they may execute the duties of their appointed office.
1. The Constitutional Oath
As noted below in Article VI, U.S. Constitution, all federal officials must take an oath in support of the Constitution: [ emphasis added ]
“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
NOTE: – The Oath of Office is to support and defend the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, not Supreme Court Precedent !!!
- Also, Article VI., U.S. Constitution explicitly states there are three things which are “the supreme Law of the Land” –
1) The U.S. Constitution itself;
2) Laws of the United States (Federal Laws) made in pursuance thereof; and
3) U.S. Treaties
NOT ONE WORD IN THE U.S CONSTITUTION ABOUT THE SUPREMACY OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS OR PRECEDENT !
2. The Judicial Oath
“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
By her record, by her [repeated non-] answers before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, it is clear Obama’s nominee Elena Kagan has no intention of upholding the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution - therefore, no United States Senator should give Kagan their vote for confirmation; and every Senator should do their utmost to block her confirmation,including blocking the vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Rule IV. of that Committee provides a way for the vote to be blocked, IF ALL SEVEN REPUBLICAN SENATORS ON THE COMMITTEE STAND FIRM, and do all within their power to block these DANGEROUS, UNQUALIFIED, DOMESTIC ENEMY OF THE CONSTITUTION.
“They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them.” Proverb 28:4, KJB
(Video) Opening Statement by Senator Sessions (R-AL), June 28, 2010
Senator Sessions summarizes his concerns regarding Obama’s SCOTUS nominee, Elena Kagan
Solicitor General Elena Kagan
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing
Confirmation Hearing, Day One: Monday, June 28
Opening Statements By Senator
Ranking Member Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Video – 10+ minutes (13:19 – 23:44)
Senator Sessions’ concerns including:
Elena Kagan’s lack of real legal experience, her views and actions regarding socialism, court activism, restriction of gun rights, opposition to (CCL: even) partial-birth abortion, her assertion in court as Solicitor General that the federal government is allowed to ban publication of political free speech pamphlets before an election, a legal brief filed approved by her as Solicitor General asking the Supreme Court to “strike down provisions of the Legal Arizona Workers Act, which suspends or revokes business licenses of corporations which knowingly hire illegal immigrants, even though federal law expressly prohibits such hiring.” Her actions as Solicitor General regarding the Congress’ “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy for the US Military appear to have “deliberately and unnecessarily” put that law in jeopardy. Her association of herself with openly activist judges. Concerns as President and Congress have taken actions which are consistent with the revival of the Progressive philosophy from a century ago, which viewed the United States Constitution as an outdated impediment to their vision for a “new social and political order”.